Sign in
Saints

Saint

Bayazid Bastami

Died: 261 AH (875)
Sourced · awaiting review
Machine translation · reviewed by: —

This text was translated from the Turkish original by AI; no person has reviewed it yet. The original is on the Turkish page.

One of the first great Sufis; he is called “Sultan al-'arifin” (Sultan of the Gnostics) and pir-i Bistam. His full name is Abu Yazid Tayfur b. 'Isa b. Surushan. In the history of Sufism he is known for his sayings and ecstatic utterances (shathiyyat) on intoxication, annihilation, blame, divine unity, gnosis, love, ascension and self-sacrifice.

Almost all the books of Sufism and of biographical classes speak of him; but what they give concerns mostly his legends, sayings and ecstatic utterances, and very little of it concerns his life. According to this limited information he was born in the town of Bistam in the Iranian province of Khurasan. His grandfather Surushan (Sarushan) had been an Iranian Zoroastrian cleric who became a Muslim. His father 'Isa, known for his piety, had two daughters and three sons — Adam, Tayfur and 'Ali — all three devout ascetics; Tayfur, who became famous as “Bayazid”, was the middle one. The source notes that Jami recorded his name wrongly as “Abu Yazid Tayfur b. 'Isa b. Adam b. Surushan”, which is in fact the name of the grandson of his elder brother Adam; to keep the two apart the first is called the Elder Bayazid and the second the Younger Bayazid.

'Attar says that he benefited from 103 masters; Harawi states that he was at first a Hanafi. That Sarraj counts him among the Sufis who performed the pilgrimage only once in their lives shows that he did not travel much for learning and gnosis; indeed he himself told Ahmad b. Khadrawayh that much wandering was not a good thing.

According to Sarraj, his master in Sufism was a certain Abu 'Ali al-Sindi: Bayazid taught this unlettered shaykh as much religious law as was needed to perform the obligatory duties, and in return learned from him the knowledge of divine unity and annihilation. 'Attar says that he reached this station through severe austerities and hard spiritual struggles. Judging by some of his sayings, he believed that he received his mystical knowledge directly from God.

Since he lived in the formative age of Sufism, there are legends connecting him with many of his contemporaries; the most important concern Shaqiq al-Balkhi, Hatim al-Asamm, Ahmad b. Khadrawayh, Dhu'l-Nun, Abu Turab al-Nakhshabi, Yahya b. Mu'adh and Sahl b. 'Abd Allah. The source records that most of these events are not reliably attested, and that it is striking that no legend is related between him and Ma'ruf al-Karkhi, Harith al-Muhasibi, Sari al-Saqati, Abu Hafs al-Haddad and Hamdun al-Qassar, although they lived in the same period.

Even in his lifetime he was visited by many; a considerable number of them attached themselves to him and adopted his views, and some were of his own family. Abu Musa, son of his elder brother Adam, Abu Musa's son Musa b. 'Isa, known as 'Umayy, and Tayfur b. 'Isa, known as the Younger Bayazid, were Sufis attached to his views. Among them Abu Musa was a loyal pupil and servant whose purity of heart he esteemed and to whom he confided secrets he disclosed to no one else. Ibrahim al-Harawi, Hasan b. 'Alawiyya, Abu 'Abd Allah al-Maghribi and Abu Musa al-Dubayli are among his well-known disciples and deputies.

The hadith scholar Husayn b. 'Isa al-Bistami, alleging that he had said “Like the Prophet, I too have an ascension”, expelled him from Bistam. Bayazid then went on pilgrimage and afterwards returned to Jurjan, and was able to come back to Bistam only after that man's death.

The date of his death is disputed: the sources give the years 234 (848) and 261 (875); the heading of the entry records 234/848 with a question mark (details under Multiple Perspectives). His grave is in Bistam.

His Circle of Influence — Through his rapturous conduct, overflowing words and sincere state he left a deep mark on those around him and gathered a select group around his views. His followers were called Tayfuris, and his path Tayfuriyya or Bistamiyya; the source specifies that this was not an order in the usual sense but a current within Sufism. Great Sufis such as Hallaj, Shibli, Kharaqani, Abu Sa'id-i Abu'l-Khayr, Niffari, Sana'i, 'Attar, Jami, Ibn al-'Arabi, Ibn al-Farid and Rumi are recorded as having remained attached to this current; the Shattariyya and 'Ishqiyya orders took him as their founding master. He holds a place as the head of a branch in the chains of several orders; the source finds it particularly striking that the Naqshbandiyya gives him an important place in its chain and sometimes counts him an Uwaysi. The words of Abu Sa'id-i Abu'l-Khayr as he visited his grave — “This is a place where everyone can find what they have lost” — show that his influence continued after his death; and the later practice of praising a saint by calling him “the Bayazid of the age” shows his standing among the people.

His Poetry and Sufi Line — According to the source, he held that the wayfarer must pass beyond himself (intoxication, sukr) and extinguish his ego (annihilation, fana') to reach God; this degree is attained only through constant austerity, hard struggle with the self, deep reflection and attentive vigilance. He relates that when he asked how he could reach God, he received the answer “Leave your self and come”, whereupon he slipped out of his ego like a snake out of its skin. To convey the length of the road to God he said: “After leaving thousands of stations behind, I saw that I was in the word of God, not in its meaning.” He describes God's essence in negative terms; he often uses the terms I-ness, you-ness and He-ness (ana'iyya, antiyya, huwiyya), and depicts passing beyond his own self to reach God as an ascension (mi'raj); 'Attar's Tadhkirat al-awliya' and Sahlagi's Kitab al-Nur give ample space to this spiritual ascension. The source characterizes him as a Sufi of love; he described his state in the words: “I came out upon a plain where love rained down; its ground was soaked; here the foot sinks into love as into snow.” Although many miracles and unveilings are related of him, he did not want extraordinary states to be given importance, and said that what matters is to hold to the rules of the sacred law: when told “So-and-so crosses distances in an instant” he said “Satan and the carrion-eating crows do the same”, and when told “So-and-so walks on water” he said “So do the fish.” He would say that God does not entrust the secret of sainthood to one who breaks any of the proprieties of the law; setting out to visit a man believed to be great, he saw from afar that the man blew his nose towards the qibla, and gave up the meeting. It is recorded that he never once spat on the road from his house to the mosque, and that even when alone he always sat on his knees, thinking himself in God's presence. He loved people greatly; once he said: “O God! Cast me into hell and make my body so large that there is no room left in hell for anyone else.”

His Works — The source records no independent work. He is one of the first Sufis to express his mystical views in Persian; these sayings were later translated into Arabic. It is related that part of his ecstatic utterances was translated for Junayd al-Baghdadi by his nephew Abu Musa. Sahlagi collected his ecstatic utterances in Kitab al-Nur, and Baqli explained an important part of them in Sharh-i shathiyyat. Some treatises said to contain his sayings and poems were published by 'Abd al-Rahman Badawi in Shatahat al-sufiyya (Cairo 1949).

His Tomb and Complex — His tomb stands in Bistam, in the very middle of the place where the historic buildings are gathered together, free of ornament and splendour. The tomb built by Öljeitü has been visited throughout history by many sultans and statesmen.

Miracles

The following are reports that appear in the source as TRANSMITTED accounts; the atlas records them not as 'this happened' but as 'this is what the sources relate'. The source also states that most of the events said to have taken place between Bayazid and his contemporary Sufis are not reliably attested.

His answer to Yahya b. Mu'adh — It is related that when Yahya b. Mu'adh sent him word, “Someone here has drunk so deeply from the cup of love that he will never thirst again”, he replied: “Someone here has drunk the seven seas in one gulp and still opens his mouth asking, is there no more?” (Source: TDV Encyclopedia of Islam, “Bâyezîd-i Bistâmî”, vol. 5)

The ants — It is related that when he saw that a few ants had got into mustard seed he had bought in Hamadan and had come with it to Bistam, he carried the ants back to Hamadan and left them where they had been; the source cites this as an example of his compassion for animals. (Source: TDV Encyclopedia of Islam, “Bâyezîd-i Bistâmî”, vol. 5)

Ghazan Khan's dream — It is related that Ghazan Khan wished to build a mausoleum over his grave, but that Bayazid appeared to him in a dream and dissuaded him. (Source: TDV Encyclopedia of Islam, “Bâyezîd-i Bistâmî”, vol. 5)

Differing Scholarly Views

The source is Süleyman Uludağ's entry in the TDV Encyclopedia of Islam, written within Sunni historiography of Sufism. The author's own assessments are set apart below as “the source says”; the other views are given under the names of those who hold them. The atlas takes no side in these debates.

Dates of death and birth — Qushayri gives 234 (848) and 261 (875) as the year of his death and prefers the latter; Harawi too considers 261 more correct; Sulami records both dates without choosing. Sahlagi says that he died in 234 at the age of seventy-three, which would put his birth in 161 (777). 'Abd al-Rafi' states that he was born in 131 (748) and died in 234 at the age of 103. The source says that of these the report of Sahlagi is the closest to the truth, and gives 234/848 with a question mark in the entry's heading. The date recorded in the atlas (261/875) corresponds to the preference of Qushayri and Harawi. The atlas makes no choice between the two dates.

His teachers in Shi'i sources — Shi'i sources generally record that he was among the pupils of the sixth imam Ja'far al-Sadiq (d. 148/765). There are also those who present him as a pupil of the seventh imam Musa al-Kazim (d. 183/799), the eighth imam 'Ali al-Rida (d. 203/818) and the ninth imam Muhammad al-Taqi (d. 220/835); Khwansari says in Rawdat al-jannat that the name Abu Ja'far Jawad may have been altered into Ja'far Sadiq. The source does not consider the report of his studying with Ja'far al-Sadiq chronologically correct. The atlas records the report of the Shi'i tradition and the author's chronological assessment side by side.

The ecstatic utterances — For Bayazid, who gave great weight to intoxication, the state of annihilation is essentially a state of intoxication. The ecstatic utterances he spoke in rapture and ecstasy need explanation and interpretation: Sarraj in al-Luma' relates Junayd al-Baghdadi's explanations of some of them; Baqli comments on an important part of those collected by Sahlagi. “Glory be to me, how great is my majesty” is among the famous utterances the source lists. The views diverge as follows: ① Harawi says that much was fabricated against him because of his ecstatic utterances and does not allow that such expressions could be his. ② The Sufis repeated these sayings with delight; some scholars of law and theology, however, met them with sharp reaction and held that the beliefs he concealed came to light in the state of intoxication; Ibn Salim rejects the utterances. ③ According to the source, most scholars of hadith, law and theology, while not approving of the utterances, excused him on account of the state of intoxication. ④ Ibn Taymiyya says that such words spoken in intoxication should be concealed rather than spread, speaks of him with respect, and strongly objects in particular to the Sufis of the unity of being adducing these words as proof. The atlas does not prefer any of these views; it records the existence of the utterances and the debate around them.

The interpretation of “Hama ust” — The source takes the saying “Hama ust” (all is He), which he used to express the passing away even from annihilation, as pointing not to the unity of being (wahdat al-wujud) but to the unity of witnessing (wahdat al-shuhud); its reason is that the unity of being was not known in the Islamic world in his time. On the other hand, the Sufis of the unity of being, above all Ibn al-'Arabi, presented him as a Sufi who held this belief. The atlas makes no choice between the two interpretations.

Criticized words and conduct — His saying that he did not fear hell, set little value on paradise, and regarded prayer as mere standing and fasting as mere hunger was interpreted as making light of matters important in Islam and was criticized. That in Samarqand, to disperse those who had gathered around him, he repeated the words the Qur'an reports of Pharaoh, “I am your lord most high”, and that on another occasion he broke his fast in Ramadan to escape the excessive attention of the people and keep his self from pride, also drew criticism. The source states that with his saying about “the plain where love rained down” he meant to describe the overflowing words and deeds that came from him as slips of the foot on the soaked ground of love. The atlas records the criticisms and this explanation side by side.

Intoxication and sobriety — According to the source, the path of the Junaydiyya, defending sobriety (sahw) against intoxication, arose as a reaction to Tayfurism, which was regarded as a kind of challenge to the general rules and the rulings of the law. Junayd al-Baghdadi, who said “Bayazid's place among the Sufis is like Gabriel's place among the angels” and commented on some of his utterances, held nonetheless that he did not reach the final degree in Sufism; his words and states are of the kind seen at the beginning and middle of the path.

The source of his mystical views — Various views have been put forward on this: Suhrawardi al-Maqtul regards him as a representative of pre-Islamic Iranian spiritual life; his grandfather's being a Zoroastrian was adduced as evidence for this claim, and the view has recently won many adherents in Iran; Abu'l-'Ala 'Afifi holds the same view. That his master Abu 'Ali al-Sindi was from India was put forward as evidence that he was influenced by the Vedas and Buddhism. Kamil Mustafa al-Shaybi draws attention to a strong connection between his thought and Shi'ism. 'Abd al-Qadir Mahmud maintains that indwelling and union (hulul and ittihad) form the basis of his mystical outlook; and the criticisms of Ibn al-Jawzi in Talbis Iblis are quite harsh. The atlas adopts none of these views; it records them together with their holders.

Sources

  1. TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi (DİA) · vol. 5, pp. 238-241, entry “Bâyezîd-i Bistâmî”

The sources for this record are listed below (Mandatory Sources).

Spotted an error in this record? Suggest a correction with its source

Permanent ID: EA-Z-000340 · this address reaches the same record even if its name changes; use it when citing.

External records: TDV Encyclopedia of Islam article