He is the pĂŽr (founding master) of the Celvetiyye order, one of the most widely influential Ottoman Sufis, and a major voice of Turkish tekke poetry. His given name was MahmĂťd, son of Fazlullah b. MahmĂťd; the pen-name "HĂźdâyĂŽ" was bestowed on him by his master Ăftâde, while the epithet "AzĂŽz" (saintly) before his name arose from the reverence of the people.
He was born in 948/1541 in Ĺereflikoçhisar. After his first schooling he went to Istanbul and entered the Kßçßk Ayasofya Madrasa; upon completing his studies he became the muĂŽd (assistant) of his teacher NâzÄąrzâde Ramazan Efendi. While studying tafsĂŽr, hadĂŽth and fiqh he also attended the gatherings of NĂťreddinzâde Muslihuddin Efendi, the HalvetĂŽ shaykh of the Kßçßk Ayasofya Mosque â so his contact with Sufism reaches back to his madrasa years. When his teacher was appointed professor at the Selimiye Madrasa in Edirne and then judge (kadÄą) in Egypt and Damascus, he kept HĂźdâyĂŽ at his side. While in Egypt, HĂźdâyĂŽ received "usĂťl-i esmâ" training from KerĂŽmĂźddin el-HalvetĂŽ of the DemirtaĹiyye branch of the Halvetiyye.
Returning from Egypt in 1573, he was appointed professor at the Ferhâdiye Madrasa in Bursa and deputy judge at the Câmi-i AtĂŽk court. In the third year after his arrival in Bursa his teacher died. The depth of that loss led him to leave his official posts and to become a disciple of Muhyiddin Ăftâde, whose sermons and gatherings he had already been attending (984/1576). Ăftâde asked him to renounce first his property, then his office; and, to break his pride, to sell liver on a pole through the streets of Bursa while still dressed in his judge's robes. HĂźdâyĂŽ hesitated at none of it.
Under strict spiritual discipline he completed his seyr Ăź sĂźlĂťk in about three years. Ăftâde appointed him deputy (halife) to Sivrihisar; he could stay only about six months and returned to Bursa to see his master. When Ăftâde died he crossed to Rumelia; after some time in Thrace and the Balkans he came to Istanbul. Through the intercession of ĹeyhĂźlislâm Hoca Sâdeddin Efendi he served eight years as shaykh of the Kßçßk Ayasofya lodge, while also preaching at the Fâtih Mosque and teaching tafsĂŽr and hadĂŽth.
In 1589 he purchased the site in ĂskĂźdar where the HĂźdâyĂŽ lodge stands today, moving his residence near the Rum Mehmed PaĹa Mosque so as to follow the construction closely. The lodge was completed in 1595 and served at the same time as a tevhidhâne; in 1007/1598-99 its own founder turned it into a mosque by adding a minbar. In 1599 he gave up preaching at the Fâtih Mosque and began Thursday sermons at the Mihrimah Sultan (İskele) Mosque in ĂskĂźdar. At the opening of the Sultan Ahmed Mosque (1616) it was he who delivered the first Friday sermon, and he agreed to preach there on the first Monday of every month; TEİS records that he also attended the foundation ceremony (1018/1609) together with Sultan Ahmed I and the ĹeyhĂźlislâm. During his ĂskĂźdar years he had a retreat cell (çilehâne) and a bath built in Bulgurlu; the village of Bulgurlu where the retreat stood, the IlÄąsuluk fields and part of Gaziler hill were registered in his name by an imperial decree of Ahmed I.
He died in Safer 1038 (October 1628) in ĂskĂźdar. He had eleven children, six of them daughters; his line continued through his daughters ĂmmĂźgĂźlsĂźm (d. 1641), Zeyneb (d. 1642) and Fatma Zehrâ (d. 1675). The chronogram poems written for his death are numerous enough to fill a small divan.
Circle of Influence
HĂźdâyĂŽ's influence reached from the common people to the palace. He wrote letters of counsel to sultans such as Murad III, Ahmed I and Osman II; he girded Murad IV with the sword of state; he joined Ferhad PaĹa's Tabriz campaign. Evliya Ăelebi relates that seven sultans kissed his hand and that he gave the pledge (irâdet) to 170,000 disciples. His lodge overflowed with people of every rank: Grand Vizier Halil PaĹa of Kayseri, Dilâver PaĹa, Hoca Sâdeddin Efendi, Sun'ullah Efendi, ĹeyhĂźlislâm Hocazâde Esad Efendi, Okçuzâde Mehmed ĹâhĂŽ Efendi, SarÄą Abdullah Efendi, Nev'ĂŽzâde AtâÎ and Olanlar Ĺeyhi İbrâhim Efendi were among its affiliates or regulars. It is related that at his death he had close to sixty deputies. Through him and his deputies the Celvetiyye left a deep mark on the religious and Sufi life of Anatolia and the Balkans; his lodge became one of Istanbul's foremost centres of Sufism and culture, producing many scholars, shaykhs and musicians. The most famous author of that lodge's tradition is İsmâil HakkÄą of Bursa, author of RĂťhu'l-beyân; he quotes HĂźdâyĂŽ often and, comparing him with MahmĂťd of Ghazna, says: "Two MahmĂťds came to this world / one the famous MahmĂťd of Ghazna / the other the MahmĂťd of inner meaning." That histories and bibliographies of his own time and after refer to him with titles such as "kutbĂź'l-aktâb" (pole of poles), "sâhib-i zamân" and "mĂźrĹid-i kâmil" shows that his fame outlived him.
Poetry and Sufi Line
Belonging to popular Sufi literature, HĂźdâyĂŽ wrote plain, aphoristic tekke poems; his poems, mostly in the ilâhĂŽ (hymn) form, are numerous enough to form a divan. He used sometimes syllabic and sometimes aruz metre. He adhered to the doctrine of the unity of being (vahdet-i vĂźcĂťd) as systematised by Ibn al-'ArabĂŽ, and this is plain in his works, poems and letters â the TDV author notes that it is hard to claim he treated that doctrine as deeply as YĂťnus Emre, yet he versified the vast spirit of Sufism with sincere expression. Some of his hymns were set to music by himself, others by his admirers and affiliates; these compositions were sung in the lodges for centuries and became inseparable from the gatherings of dhikr. Many Sufi poets wrote imitations (nazĂŽre) of his YĂťnus-style hymns. His verses on devotion to his master sum up this line: "The nightingale of the garden of love is Hazret-i Ăftâde / the physician of grieving lovers is Hazret-i Ăftâde." The Celvetiyye he founded divided into four branches â Selâmiyye, HakkÄąyye, Fenâiyye and HâĹimiyye; in the years just before the closure of the lodges there were about thirty tekkes of these branches in Istanbul.
Works
He left around thirty works in Arabic and Turkish, writing most in Arabic in keeping with the convention of his age.
Chief among the Arabic works:
- NefâisĂź'l-mecâlis â a Sufi commentary on selected verses; its best and oldest copy in the SĂźleymaniye Library, Ĺehid Ali PaĹa 172-174
- Câmiu'l-fezâil ve kâmiu'r-rezâil â scholarly, practical and moral virtues; oldest copy KĂśprĂźlĂź Library 1853/3; translated into Turkish by H. Kâmil YÄąlmaz as "İlim Amel ve Seyr Ăź SĂźlĂťk", Istanbul 1988
- Miftâhu's-salât ve mirkÄtĂź'n-necât â the merits and wisdom of the ritual prayer, also citing Ibn al-'ArabĂŽ and SuhrawardĂŽ; oldest copy 1010/1601, Murad Molla Library 1314/4
- HulâsatĂź'l-ahbâr fĂŽ ahvâli'n-nebiyyi'l-muhtâr â creation, being and the Muhammadan reality; oldest copy 1037/1627, HacÄą Selim AÄa Library, HĂźdâÎ Efendi 258
- HabbetĂź'l-mahabbe â love of God, the Prophet and the Ahl al-Bayt; translated by Ahmed Remzi AkyĂźrek as "MahbĂťbĂź'l-ahibbe", published in modern letters by Rasim Deniz, Kayseri 1982
- KeĹfĂź'l-kÄąnâ' an vechi's-semâ' â a defence of the lawfulness of semâ; 1016/1607 copy in the KĂśprĂźlĂź Library 1583/7; YÄąlmaz's translation in MĂİFD no. 4 [1986], pp. 273-284
Besides these he wrote HayâtĂź'l-ervâh ve necâtĂź'l-eĹbâh, el-Fethu'l-ilâhĂŽ, Tecelliyât, et-TarĂŽkatĂź'l-Muhammediyye, Fethu'l-bâb ve ref'u'l-hicâb and el-MecâlisĂź'l-va'zÄąyye. The VâkĹât, composed of the notes he took at his master Ăftâde's gatherings, is generally attributed to him as well.
Chief among the Turkish works:
- Divan â DĂŽvân-Äą İlâhiyyât; some 255 hymns together with quatrains and fragments â published separately by Kemaleddin Ĺenocak and Ziver Tezeren, Istanbul 1970 and 1986
- NecâtĂź'l-garĂŽk fi'l-cem' ve't-tefrĂŽk â the terms cem' and fark in verse
- TarĂŽkatnâme â the etiquette of the Celvetiyye
- MektĂťbât â 152 Turkish letters, most to Murad III, and some twenty-two Arabic ones; SĂźleymaniye Library, Fâtih 2572
- Nesâih ve Mevâiz â 237 folios in forty-three chapters; the only known copy in the HacÄą Selim AÄa Library, HĂźdâÎ Efendi 266
- Mi'râciyye â HĂźdâÎ Efendi 262
The first three Turkish works were printed as "KĂźlliyyât-Äą Hazret-i HĂźdâyĂŽ" (Istanbul 1287), and Mehmed GĂźlĹen Efendi (d. 1925), one of the last shaykhs of the HĂźdâyĂŽ âsitâne, reissued the same collection with a fuller biography and the addition of et-TarĂŽkatĂź'l-Muhammediyye (Istanbul 1338). The many copies of his works in Istanbul libraries, and the commentaries and glosses written on many of them by CelvetĂŽs and members of other orders, attest how widely they were embraced.
Tomb and Complex
The complex founded between 997 and 1003 (1589-1595) at DoÄancÄąlar in ĂskĂźdar, in the Ahmet Ăelebi quarter, became the âsitâne and "house of the pĂŽr" of the Celvetiyye; Ottoman sources call it "Hazret-i HĂźdâyĂŽ Ăsitânesi" and "PĂŽĹvâ-yÄą TarĂŽkat-Äą Aliyye-i Celvetiyye", among other names. In the fire of 1266/1850 every building except the tomb was lost, and the complex was rebuilt by Sultan AbdĂźlmecid in 1272/1855-56. At the centre of the tomb's rectangular chamber rises a wooden dome resting on four marble columns, divided on the inside into thirteen segments like the crest of the CelvetĂŽ cap; beneath it stands the pĂŽr's wooden sarcophagus enclosed by gilded iron screens, surrounded by ten sarcophagi of his children and one grandchild. Above the chamber door is an Arabic inscription in ta'lĂŽk script giving the date of his death (1038/1628), and around the upper walls runs a thuluth frieze of SĂťrat al-Mulk from the pen of the calligrapher Mahmud Celâleddin. From his death until 1925 the tomb was visited collectively by members of the Celvetiyye on the eves of religious festivals, led by the shaykh of the âsitâne; it has kept to this day its standing among the most frequented saints' tombs in Istanbul. His prayer for his affiliates, lovers and the visitors of his tomb â "that they not drown at sea, that they not see poverty at the end of their lives, and that they not depart before their faith is secured" â placed his tomb among the most visited in Istanbul after EyĂźp Sultan, SĂźnbĂźl Efendi and Yahyâ Efendi.
His Counsels and Teachings
HßdâyÎ's counsel rests not on free-floating sayings attributed to him but on the works he WROTE and the hymns he sang. This section gives the subject matter of those works and the versified examples we have, with sources named; the atlas records no sentence as "HßdâyÎ said" unless it is his.
The Triad of Knowledge, Practice and Character
The title of his most widely read work, Câmiu'l-fezâil ve kâmiu'r-rezâil, already states its programme: gathering the virtues, crushing the vices. The book has three chapters treating, in order, scholarly, practical and moral virtues. H. Kâmil YĹlmaz translated it into Turkish as "İlim Amel ve Seyr ß SßlÝk" (Istanbul 1988). In HßdâyÎ's understanding of training, knowledge alone is not sufficient; unless completed by practice and character it does not count as virtue (TDV DİA; TEİS)
The Wisdom of the Prayer
Miftâhu's-salât ve mirkÄtĂź'n-necât ("the key of prayer and the ladder of salvation") is a treatise on the merits and wisdom of the ritual prayer, in which HĂźdâyĂŽ also gives place to the views of great Sufis such as Muhyiddin Ibn al-'ArabĂŽ and Shihâb al-DĂŽn al-SuhrawardĂŽ. Its oldest copy is dated 1010/1601 (TDV DİA)
The Lesson of Love
Habbetß'l-mahabbe ("the seed of love") is a small treatise on the love of God, of the Prophet and of the Ahl al-Bayt. Ahmed Remzi Akyßrek translated it as "MahbÝbß'l-ahibbe" and Rasim Deniz published it in modern letters (Kayseri 1982) (TDV DİA)
In Defence of Semâ
KeĹfĂź'l-kÄąnâ' an vechi's-semâ' ("lifting the veil from the face of semâ") was written in defence of the lawfulness of semâ. Its 1016/1607 copy is in the KĂśprĂźlĂź Library; H. Kâmil YÄąlmaz published his translation as "AzĂŽz MahmĂťd HĂźdâyĂŽ's Treatise on Semâ" (MĂİFD no. 4 [1986], pp. 273-284). The treatise shows his manner of defending Sufi practice with scholarly proof (TDV DİA)
The Etiquette of the Path and the Terms of Wayfaring
Among his Turkish treatises, TarĂŽkatnâme sets out the etiquette of the Celvetiyye order, while NecâtĂź'l-garĂŽk fi'l-cem' ve't-tefrĂŽk explains in verse the Sufi terms "cem'" (union) and "fark" (separation) (TDV DİA). The VâkĹât consists of the notes he took at his master Ăftâde's gatherings â that is, his own notebook of learning â and contains the moral and mystical conversations that passed between master and disciple over three years (TDV DİA; TEİS)
Preaching and Admonition
Nesâih ve Mevâiz contains his sermons and admonitions; it runs to 237 folios in forty-three chapters, and its only known manuscript is in the HacÄą Selim AÄa Library (HĂźdâÎ Efendi no. 266). The MektĂťbât consists of 152 Turkish letters, most of them to Murad III, and some twenty-two in Arabic (SĂźleymaniye Library, Fâtih no. 2572); TEİS records that these letters also voiced THE VIEWS OF THE PEOPLE concerning the governance of the state â that is, he counselled the palace by carrying to it the condition of the people (TDV DİA; TEİS)
The Principle of Humility
His answer when Sultan Ahmed I asked to be accepted as a disciple is transmitted as the summary of his understanding of the path: "In our order there is no distinction of rank or office." According to the narration, the sultan thereafter attended his gatherings together with the other disciples, indistinguishable from an ordinary dervish (TEİS)
The Discipline of the Self
That his master Ăftâde required him to abandon property and estate, then office, and to sell liver on a pole through the streets of Bursa in his judge's robes in order to break his pride, is the best-known example showing that in HĂźdâyĂŽ's understanding of wayfaring the discipline of the self comes before learning and rank (TEİS)
His Counsels in His Own Verse
The stanzas below are taken from published editions of the DÎvân-Ĺ İlâhiyyât, with sources named.
â Seeking God alone:
What shall I do with the world
it is my God I need
I want nothing besides Him
it is my God I needI want no passing fortune
no manner of ornament
no paradise without the Truth
it is my God I needLeave vain desire aside
find the Truth, yâ HÝ
this is HßdâyÎ's word
it is my God I need.
TatcÄą, Mustafa â YÄąldÄąz, Musa [eds.], AzĂŽz MahmĂťd HĂźdâyĂŽ, Divân-Äą İlâhĂŽyât, Istanbul: ĂskĂźdar Municipality, 2005, pp. 97-99; from the "Examples from his works" section of TEİS.
⥠Seeking forgiveness, the manners of a servant:
If I have strayed outside the straight path
my master, my sultan, I ask God's forgiveness
whatever I have done against Your pleasure
my master, my sultan, I ask God's forgivenessThe servant's lot is error, heedlessness, forgetting
the master's is pardon, mercy, forgiveness
from You again comes the cure for every ill
my master, my sultan, I ask God's forgiveness.
Same edition, p. 487.
⢠Looking on creation with the eye of instruction:
What is the cause of the roses that open at dawn
what of the enraptured nightingales that singThose who look upon the power of the Sustainer
who see the artistry of the Truth plainly
look upon the new spring with the eye of instruction
what is the cause of flowing waters and blowing windsAll of it is the work of the Absolutely Powerful
and whoever grasps this secret is the knower.
Same edition, pp. 127-129.
⣠Love of the Prophet and the plea for intercession:
Your coming is mercy, delight and serenity, O Messenger of God
your appearing is the cure for the ailment of lovers, O Messenger of GodIntercede for HßdâyÎ, outwardly and inwardly
he is a beggar who has attached himself to your door, O Messenger of God.
Same edition, pp. 73-75.
⤠Devotion to the guide:
If you desire a lofty guide, hold fast to his pure hem
the one who shows the way of guidance is Hazret-i Ăftâde
be a servant in sincerity always at HßdâyÎ's threshold
know in truth that the pole of poles is Hazret-i Ăftâde.
Ertan, Mehmed Emin, Aziz Mahmud HĂźdâyĂŽ, Istanbul: Ĺule YayÄąnlarÄą, 2001, p. 70; from TEİS.
His Manner
The TDV author records that HßdâyÎ wrote plain, aphoristic tekke poems, using sometimes syllabic and sometimes aruz metre, and that he adhered to the doctrine of the unity of being as systematised by Ibn al-'ArabÎ; the same author notes that it is hard to claim he treated that doctrine as deeply as YÝnus Emre, yet that he versified the vast spirit of Sufism with sincere expression. Some of his hymns were set to music by himself and some by his admirers and affiliates; these compositions were sung in the lodges for centuries and became inseparable from the gatherings of dhikr (TDV DİA)
Miracles
The accounts below are narrations (rivâyet) as they appear in the sources; the atlas records them not as "this is what happened" but as "this is what the sources relate". The work each account comes from is given in parentheses.
Two Accounts of His Initiation
According to the first, HĂźdâyĂŽ saw in a dream certain people he had assumed were destined for Paradise â among them his own teacher NâzÄąrzâde Efendi â burning in the fire of Hell. Deeply shaken, he took it as a sign shown to him in the world of meaning, and the next day left his property, his estate and his office to become a dervish of Ăftâde (TEİS)
The second account rests on a divorce case brought before him during his judgeship in Bursa. A man of Bursa who intended every year to make the pilgrimage but never went was told by his wife, "Do not form the intention in vain"; he answered, "God willing I shall go; if I do not, I divorce you thrice." The man was seen at home until the Day of Arafa, disappeared that day, and knocked at his door on the fifth day of the feast; his wife, recalling his words, would not open, and the matter was brought to the judge. The man asked that the return of the pilgrim caravan be awaited and their testimony taken. When the caravan returned the witnesses testified that they had been with him on the pilgrimage, naming the places where they had sat and lodged. Judge HĂźdâyĂŽ ruled that no divorce had taken place, and asked the man to explain how this had come about; he said it had been accomplished through the mediation of Mehmed Dede the cobbler, by way of "traversing space" (tayy-Äą mekân). The more widespread account continues that HĂźdâyĂŽ then went to Mehmed Dede's shop wishing to become his disciple, and that Mehmed Dede sent him on to Ăftâde with the words: "Your portion is not from us but from Hazret-i Ăftâde" (TEİS; the narration is referred to Tezeren 1987, pp. 9-10 and YÄąlmaz 1990, pp. 46-47)
The Trial of the Liver
Before accepting him, Ăftâde required that he renounce first his property and then his office; and, to place his ego underfoot and break his pride, that he sell liver on a pole through the streets of Bursa in his judge's robes. HĂźdâyĂŽ accepted without hesitation and entered the circle of guidance in this way (TEİS). The sources relate this not as a miracle but as the discipline of the self that precedes miracles.
The Dream of Sultan Ahmed I
Sultan Ahmed I turned to HßdâyÎ to have a dream interpreted; so pleased was he with the interpretation that he counted it a miracle, kissed his hand and asked to be accepted as a disciple. HßdâyÎ replied, "In our order there is no distinction of rank or office," and told him his wish was granted. From then on Ahmed I attended his gatherings together with the other disciples, indistinguishable from an ordinary dervish. It is related that the sultan poured water from the ewer for his shaykh's ablution while the Vâlide Sultan held the towel (TEİS; the narration is referred to Kßçßk 1976, p. 186)
"Let Sultans Walk Behind Him"
It is related that these words, spoken by Ăftâde to HĂźdâyĂŽ before his death, were fulfilled when Ahmed I, out of reverence, mounted him on his own horse in the ĂskĂźdar market and walked behind him for a time like a groom (TEİS; the narration is referred to Tezeren 1987, p. 15)
His Prayer For Those Who Visit Him
It is recorded that he prayed for his affiliates, those who love him and the visitors of his tomb: "that they not drown at sea, that they not see poverty at the end of their lives, and that they not depart before their faith is secured." The TDV author links directly to this prayer the fact that his tomb came to be among the most visited in Istanbul, after Eyßp Sultan, Sßnbßl Efendi and Yahyâ Efendi (TDV DİA)
Those Who Took Refuge in His Lodge
It is known that in his lifetime many statesmen who saw their lives in danger saved themselves by taking refuge in his lodge; after his death, thanks to the very rich endowment he left, his lodge, soup kitchen and complex became a shelter and refuge for the people (TDV DİA)
Evliya ĂelebiĚ's Report
The Seyahatnâme states that seven sultans kissed HßdâyÎ's hand and that he gave the pledge (irâdet) to 170,000 disciples (both TDV and TEİS transmit this). The figure is transmitted as a traveller's record; the atlas carries it not as a historical count but as contemporary testimony to his influence.
After His Death
That histories and bibliographies of his time and after refer to him with titles such as "kutbĂź'l-aktâb", "sâhib-i zamân" and "mĂźrĹid-i kâmil", and that his menkÄąbes and miracles passed from tongue to tongue, caused his visitors to increase in every age. That the complex â all of whose buildings save the tomb burned in the fire of 1266/1850 â was rebuilt by Sultan AbdĂźlmecid shows that this bond of love continued in palace circles as well (TDV DİA)
Differing Scholarly Views
This record rests on two independent academic sources: the entry "AzĂŽz Mahmud HĂźdâyĂŽ" in the TDV Encyclopaedia of Islam (Hasan Kâmil YÄąlmaz, vol. 4, pp. 338-340) and the entry "HĂDĂYĂ, AzĂŽz MahmĂťd" in the Dictionary of Names of Turkish Literature (TEİS; Hulusi Eren). They agree in outline; the points where they diverge are left visible below â in such places the atlas does not pick one source and hide the other.
The Place of His First Schooling
TDV writes that he began his first studies in Sivrihisar, where he spent his childhood; TEİS records that he received his primary schooling in Ĺereflikoçhisar. The two sources agree on his birthplace (Ĺereflikoçhisar) and on his madrasa education in Istanbul, and differ on the place of his first school.
The Judgeship of Bursa
TEİS says that upon the death of his teacher NâzÄąrzâde, HĂźdâyĂŽ was appointed judge of Bursa, and that he left the post shortly afterwards to become a disciple of Ăftâde. The TDV entry does not mention this appointment; there his offices in Bursa are a professorship and the deputy judgeship of the Câmi-i AtĂŽk court. The "Judge HĂźdâyĂŽ" narrative of the menkÄąbes agrees with the line of TEİS; the silence of TDV suggests the appointment may be disputed.
His Marriage to AyĹe Sultan
Both sources give, with the qualifier "it is related", that he married AyĹe Sultan (d. 1006/1598), granddaughter of SĂźleyman the Magnificent through his daughter Mihrimah Sultan. The marriage is thus not settled information but a narration that entered the sources.
The Order of the Initiation Accounts
TEİS states explicitly that it is not known with certainty which of the two accounts â the dream or the divorce case â happened first, and notes that the widespread narrative is the one that begins with the pilgrimage/divorce episode and leads, through the direction of Mehmed Dede the cobbler, to Ăftâde.
The Attribution of the Vâkiât
The VâkĹât, made up of notes taken at his master Ăftâde's gatherings, is in TDV's words "generally attributed to HĂźdâyĂŽ" â that is, it is a record rather than an original composition, and the attribution is not absolute. The two sources also differ on the manuscript number: TDV points to HacÄą Selim AÄa Library, HĂźdâÎ Efendi no. 250, while TEİS gives no. 249.
The List of Sultans
TDV names the sultans to whom he wrote as Murad III, Ahmed I and Osman II; TEİS adds Mehmed III and Murad IV to the list. Both agree that he girded Murad IV with the sword of state and joined Ferhad PaĹa's Tabriz campaign.
The Sultan Ahmed Mosque
That he delivered the first sermon at the opening (1024/1616) is in both sources. His attendance at the foundation ceremony (1018/1609) appears in TEİS; the name of the vizier mentioned in that sentence is not repeated here because secondary sources write it differently â the atlas neither corrects nor reproduces a probable spelling problem in its source.
The Figures
"Seven sultans kissing his hand" and "170,000 disciples" are transmitted from Evliya Ăelebi's Seyahatnâme; likewise "close to sixty deputies at his death" is given with the qualifier of narration. These figures are not a historical census but an expression of contemporary testimony and renown.
The Date of Death
Both sources agree on Safer 1038 / October 1628. As no day is stated, the atlas's death record keeps the HijrĂŽ month (Safer) and leaves the day field empty â the unknown day has not been invented.
Works
Sources
- TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi (DİA) â Hasan Kâmil YÄąlmaz ¡ vol. 4, pp. 338-340, entry âAzĂŽz Mahmud HĂźdâyĂŽâ
- TĂźrk EdebiyatÄą İsimler SĂśzlĂźÄĂź (TEİS) â Hulusi Eren ¡ entry âHĂDĂYĂ, AzĂŽz MahmĂťdâ
- TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi (DİA) â M. Baha Tanman ¡ vol. 4, pp. 340-343, entry âAzĂŽz Mahmud HĂźdâyĂŽ KĂźlliyesiâ
Every record is sourced (Mandatory Sources).
